Connection lost
Server error
Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc. Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A tenant sued his landlord to enforce an alleged oral promise for the exclusive right to sell soft drinks. The court refused to enforce the promise, holding that the parol evidence rule barred its admission because it was not included in the comprehensive written lease.
Legal Significance: This case establishes a key test for applying the parol evidence rule: if an alleged oral agreement’s subject matter would naturally and normally be included in the written contract, evidence of that oral agreement is inadmissible to alter the written terms.
Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff, Gianni, was a tenant operating a small store in an office building. The defendant, Russell Co., Inc., acquired the property and negotiated a new three-year lease with Gianni. The final written lease stipulated that Gianni was to “use the premises only for the sale of fruit, candy, soda water,” etc., and explicitly prohibited him from selling tobacco. Gianni alleged that during prior oral negotiations, the defendant’s agent promised him the exclusive right to sell soft drinks in the building in exchange for his agreement to stop selling tobacco and pay an increased rent. This exclusivity term was not included in the final written lease, which Gianni admitted to having read before signing. Shortly after the lease was executed, the defendant leased an adjacent space to a drug company without restricting its right to sell soft drinks. Gianni sued for damages for breach of the alleged oral agreement, asserting it was an independent contract. He did not allege fraud, accident, or mistake in the formation of the written lease.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the parol evidence rule bar a party from introducing evidence of a prior oral agreement granting an exclusive sales right when the subsequent written lease addresses the permissible uses of the premises but is silent on exclusivity?
Yes. The court reversed the judgment for the plaintiff, holding that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the parol evidence rule bar a party from introducing evidence of a prior oral agreement granting an exclusive sales right when the subsequent written lease addresses the permissible uses of the premises but is silent on exclusivity?
Conclusion
This case provides a foundational framework for applying the parol evidence rule, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labo
Legal Rule
Where parties, without fraud, accident, or mistake, have deliberately put their agreement Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis centered on whether the written lease was a fully Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing el
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The parol evidence rule bars evidence of an alleged oral agreement
