Connection lost
Server error
Griffin v. Wisconsin Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court upheld the warrantless search of a probationer’s home by probation officers. The Court found that the “special needs” of the probation system justify a lower standard than probable cause and obviate the need for a warrant when the search is authorized by regulation.
Legal Significance: This case established that the “special needs” of a state’s probation system can justify a departure from the Fourth Amendment’s warrant and probable cause requirements, permitting searches of probationers’ homes based on a lesser standard of “reasonable grounds” pursuant to a valid administrative regulation.
Griffin v. Wisconsin Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Joseph Griffin was on probation in Wisconsin following a felony conviction. A Wisconsin administrative regulation permitted probation officers to conduct a warrantless search of a probationer’s home if there were “reasonable grounds” to believe contraband was present. Griffin’s probation supervisor received a tip from a police detective that there “were or might be guns” in Griffin’s apartment. Acting on this tip and without a warrant, probation officers, accompanied by police, searched Griffin’s home. The search, conducted under the authority of the state regulation, uncovered a handgun. Griffin was subsequently charged and convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He moved to suppress the evidence, arguing the warrantless search violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, holding that a probationer has a diminished expectation of privacy and that the search was reasonable.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the warrantless search of a probationer’s home, conducted by probation officers pursuant to a state regulation authorizing such searches on “reasonable grounds,” violate the Fourth Amendment?
No. The warrantless search of Griffin’s home was reasonable and did not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the warrantless search of a probationer’s home, conducted by probation officers pursuant to a state regulation authorizing such searches on “reasonable grounds,” violate the Fourth Amendment?
Conclusion
This decision significantly broadened the "special needs" exception to the Fourth Amendment, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitatio
Legal Rule
A warrantless search of a probationer's home is reasonable under the Fourth Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis centered on the "special needs" doctrine, which permits exceptions Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nis
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A warrantless search of a probationer’s home by probation officers is