Connection lost
Server error
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH v. UNITED STATES Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A church hired a rector from England, violating the literal text of a law banning contracts for foreign labor. The Supreme Court held the law did not apply, looking past the statute’s plain text to Congress’s intent, which was to prohibit only manual labor.
Legal Significance: This case established the foundational principle of statutory interpretation that the “spirit” or purpose of a law can override its literal text to avoid an absurd result and effectuate the true intent of the legislature.
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH v. UNITED STATES Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Church of the Holy Trinity, a religious corporation in New York, contracted with E. Walpole Warren, an English citizen, to move to New York and serve as its rector and pastor. The United States government filed suit against the church, alleging the contract violated the Alien Contract Labor Law of 1885. The first section of that act made it unlawful for any person or corporation to assist in the importation of any alien under a contract “to perform labor or service of any kind in the United States.” The statute contained specific exemptions for professional actors, artists, lecturers, singers, and domestic servants, but did not explicitly exempt ministers or other professionals. The church conceded that its actions fell within the literal wording of the statute, as a rector performs a “service” for compensation. The Circuit Court found for the United States, holding that the contract was prohibited by the statute’s plain language. The church appealed to the Supreme Court.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a federal statute prohibiting the importation of aliens under contract to perform “labor or service of any kind” apply to a church’s contract with a foreign rector when such an application, though consistent with the statute’s plain text, contradicts the legislature’s intent?
No. The Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision, holding that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a federal statute prohibiting the importation of aliens under contract to perform “labor or service of any kind” apply to a church’s contract with a foreign rector when such an application, though consistent with the statute’s plain text, contradicts the legislature’s intent?
Conclusion
This case is a landmark decision for the purposivist school of statutory Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore
Legal Rule
A statute should not be construed to produce an absurd result, and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cup
Legal Analysis
The Court employed a purposivist approach to statutory interpretation, rejecting a strict Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A federal law banning contracts for alien “labor or service of