Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Howard F. And Mildred E. Keogh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1983Docket #74742
713 F.2d 496 13 Fed. R. Serv. 1594 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5881 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24797

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: The court affirmed a tax deficiency, holding that a coworker’s personal diary detailing tip income was admissible as a business record under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) to prove the taxpayer’s unreported income.

Legal Significance: This case establishes that personal records, if systematically maintained for an individual’s occupation or calling, can qualify as admissible business records under FRE 803(6), even if not kept by a commercial enterprise.

Howard F. And Mildred E. Keogh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Howard Keogh, a 21 dealer at the Dunes Hotel, and other dealers pooled their tips (“tokes”), which were divided daily. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue asserted deficiencies against Keogh for underreported tip income for 1969-1971. The Commissioner’s calculation relied on a statistical analysis of a diary kept by John Whitlock, Jr., another Dunes dealer. The diary contained daily entries for tips, wages, and other financial information. Whitlock made entries regularly, often after work shifts, sometimes copying from notes kept in his wallet. Keogh challenged the diary’s admissibility, arguing it was inadmissible hearsay, not a business record, untrustworthy due to Whitlock’s character, and that its admission violated the best evidence rule and due process. Whitlock, though subpoenaed, did not testify; his ex-wife, Barbara Mikle, testified about his record-keeping habits. The Tax Court admitted a photocopy of the diary and found deficiencies, albeit reduced from the Commissioner’s initial assessment.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Did the Tax Court err in admitting a photocopy of a coworker’s personal financial diary into evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (FRE 803(6)) to establish the taxpayer’s unreported tip income?

No, the Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure d

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Did the Tax Court err in admitting a photocopy of a coworker’s personal financial diary into evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (FRE 803(6)) to establish the taxpayer’s unreported tip income?

Conclusion

This case significantly broadens the application of the business records exception (FRE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris

Legal Rule

Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) permits the admission of records of regularly Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla p

Legal Analysis

The court, in section II.A of its opinion, determined that Whitlock's diary, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pari

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A personal diary that regularly and meticulously tracks income from one’s
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident,

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

I object!... to how much coffee I need to function during finals.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+