Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Hughes v. Fetter Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States1951Docket #408549
95 L. Ed. 2d 1212 71 S. Ct. 980 341 U.S. 609 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1728 95 L. Ed. 1212 Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Federal Courts

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A Wisconsin court dismissed a wrongful death suit based on an Illinois statute, citing a Wisconsin law barring such foreign claims. The Supreme Court reversed, holding the Full Faith and Credit Clause requires Wisconsin to hear the suit because its local policy was not sufficiently strong to override national interests.

Legal Significance: This case establishes that the Full Faith and Credit Clause prevents a state from refusing to enforce a sister state’s statutory cause of action based on a conflicting local public policy, particularly when the forum state has substantial connections to the parties and the litigation.

Hughes v. Fetter Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

The administrator of Harold Hughes’s estate filed a wrongful death action in a Wisconsin state court. Hughes, a Wisconsin resident, was killed in an automobile accident in Illinois. The suit was brought under the Illinois wrongful death statute against the allegedly negligent driver and an insurance company, both of whom were also Wisconsin residents or corporations. The Wisconsin trial court dismissed the complaint, citing a Wisconsin statute that created a right of action only for deaths caused within Wisconsin. The court interpreted this statute as establishing a local public policy against entertaining wrongful death suits arising under the laws of other states. The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the state’s public policy justified closing its courts to the Illinois-based claim. The administrator appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that Wisconsin’s refusal to hear the case violated the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution require a state to entertain a cause of action created by a sister state’s wrongful death statute, even if the forum state’s own law and public policy bar suits for deaths occurring outside its borders?

Yes. The Court held that Wisconsin’s statutory policy of excluding causes of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupida

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution require a state to entertain a cause of action created by a sister state’s wrongful death statute, even if the forum state’s own law and public policy bar suits for deaths occurring outside its borders?

Conclusion

Hughes v. Fetter establishes a crucial precedent limiting a state's ability to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo

Legal Rule

The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Art. IV, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dol

Legal Analysis

The Court's analysis centered on a balancing of competing state and national Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, con

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The Full Faith and Credit Clause requires a state to enforce
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+