Connection lost
Server error
In re Owens Corning Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A debtor sought to substantively consolidate its estate with its subsidiaries, which would eliminate valuable guarantees held by its banks. The Third Circuit reversed the lower court’s approval, establishing a strict, two-part test for this “last resort” equitable remedy and protecting the banks’ bargained-for contractual rights.
Legal Significance: This case establishes the Third Circuit’s definitive and restrictive test for substantive consolidation. It rejects balancing tests in favor of a stringent, two-part standard, emphasizing that the remedy is a last resort to be used sparingly to protect, not alter, creditors’ bargained-for rights.
In re Owens Corning Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Owens Corning (OCD) and its subsidiaries operated as separate legal entities, observing corporate formalities. In 1997, to secure a $2 billion loan it otherwise could not obtain, OCD had certain subsidiaries provide “absolute and unconditional” guarantees to a syndicate of Banks led by Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB). This “credit enhancement” was a critical component of the deal, providing the Banks with “structural seniority” through direct claims against the guarantors. The loan agreement explicitly required the subsidiaries to maintain their separate corporate forms and records. In 2000, facing asbestos liability, OCD and seventeen subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. As part of a proposed reorganization plan, the Debtors sought a “deemed consolidation,” which would treat the assets and liabilities of the debtor entities as pooled for purposes of distribution. This would have the effect of eliminating the Banks’ guarantees, placing them on par with OCD’s other unsecured creditors. However, the plan stipulated that the entities would not actually merge and would continue to exist separately post-bankruptcy. The District Court granted the consolidation motion, finding a “substantial identity” between the entities and concluding the Banks had not relied on the separate credit of the guarantors.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Under what circumstances may a bankruptcy court exercise its equitable power to substantively consolidate the assets and liabilities of affiliated debtor entities, thereby altering the rights of creditors who relied on their separateness?
The court reversed the District Court’s order granting substantive consolidation. The Plan Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Under what circumstances may a bankruptcy court exercise its equitable power to substantively consolidate the assets and liabilities of affiliated debtor entities, thereby altering the rights of creditors who relied on their separateness?
Conclusion
In re Owens Corning establishes a formidable barrier to substantive consolidation in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint o
Legal Rule
Substantive consolidation is an extreme and rare equitable remedy that may be Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim
Legal Analysis
The Third Circuit established a new, restrictive standard for substantive consolidation, rejecting Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt moll
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Substantive consolidation is an extreme equitable remedy to be used “sparingly”