Connection lost
Server error
Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A hospital was found liable for negligently granting surgical privileges to an incompetent doctor, whose subsequent malpractice injured a patient. The court affirmed the hospital’s direct, or corporate, negligence.
Legal Significance: This case establishes a hospital’s direct duty to patients to exercise reasonable care in selecting and credentialing medical staff, known as corporate negligence, independent of respondeat superior.
Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Johnson underwent hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky at Misericordia Community Hospital, during which his femoral artery and nerve were severed, leading to permanent paralysis. Dr. Salinsky had applied for staff privileges at Misericordia, misrepresenting his professional history and omitting information about malpractice insurance. His application stated his privileges had never been suspended or revoked, and listed consultant privileges at hospitals where he had no record. In reality, Dr. Salinsky had faced severe restrictions and denial of privileges at other Milwaukee hospitals due to concerns about his competence, including withdrawal of hip surgery privileges at Doctors Hospital and denial of any privileges at St. Anthony Hospital. Misericordia approved Dr. Salinsky’s application without a thorough investigation of his credentials, despite its own bylaws and Wisconsin Administrative Code provisions requiring a system for evaluating applicants based on character, competence, training, and experience. The hospital administrator approved the application, and Dr. Salinsky, shortly after admission, was elected chief of staff and endorsed his own privileges. The jury found Dr. Salinsky 20% negligent and Misericordia 80% negligent for its credentialing process, awarding significant damages.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a hospital have a direct duty to exercise reasonable care in the selection of its medical staff and in granting specialized surgical privileges, and was that duty breached by failing to adequately investigate a physician’s credentials, leading to patient harm?
Yes, Misericordia Hospital had a direct duty to exercise reasonable care in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volupt
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a hospital have a direct duty to exercise reasonable care in the selection of its medical staff and in granting specialized surgical privileges, and was that duty breached by failing to adequately investigate a physician’s credentials, leading to patient harm?
Conclusion
This case significantly affirms the doctrine of corporate negligence, holding hospitals directly Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exer
Legal Rule
A hospital has a non-delegable duty, owed directly to its patients, to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Exc
Legal Analysis
The court established that a hospital's duty to exercise reasonable care in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor i
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Hospitals have a direct, non-delegable duty to patients (corporate negligence) to