Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States1938Docket #200514
305 U.S. 111 59 S. Ct. 109 83 L. Ed. 73 1938 U.S. LEXIS 1137

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: National Biscuit Co. sued Kellogg Co. for unfair competition, claiming exclusive rights to the name “Shredded Wheat” and its pillow shape. The Supreme Court held Kellogg could use both, as they were generic/functional and entered the public domain after patent expiration.

Legal Significance: Established that generic terms and functional product features pass into the public domain upon patent expiration, limiting trademark protection and promoting competition.

Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

National Biscuit Company (NBC) acquired the business producing “Shredded Wheat,” a pillow-shaped breakfast cereal, originally developed by Henry Perky. Perky held patents for the product, manufacturing process, and machinery, which used “shredded” descriptively. These patents, including one for the pillow shape, expired by 1912. Kellogg Company, a competing cereal manufacturer, began producing a similar pillow-shaped biscuit called “Shredded Wheat” in 1927. NBC sued Kellogg for unfair competition, alleging exclusive rights to the name “Shredded Wheat” and the pillow shape, claiming Kellogg was passing off its goods as NBC’s. Kellogg argued the name was generic, the shape functional, and both were in the public domain post-patent expiration. Kellogg also contended it took reasonable steps to distinguish its product, using distinct packaging prominently displaying the “Kellogg’s” name.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Did National Biscuit Company possess the exclusive right to use the term “Shredded Wheat” as a trade name and to manufacture the cereal in a pillow shape, thereby preventing Kellogg Company from using the same name and shape for its competing product after the expiration of the original patents?

No. The Supreme Court reversed the Circuit Court of Appeals, holding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est labor

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Did National Biscuit Company possess the exclusive right to use the term “Shredded Wheat” as a trade name and to manufacture the cereal in a pillow shape, thereby preventing Kellogg Company from using the same name and shape for its competing product after the expiration of the original patents?

Conclusion

Kellogg v. National Biscuit Co. is a foundational case in U.S. trademark Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occae

Legal Rule

Upon the expiration of a patent, the public acquires the right to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut e

Legal Analysis

The Court, per Justice Brandeis, reasoned that "Shredded Wheat" is the generic Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo conseq

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Upon a patent’s expiration, the generic name (“Shredded Wheat”) and functional
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cu

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?