Connection lost
Server error
Knowles v. Iowa Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that a police officer cannot conduct a full search of a vehicle incident to issuing a traffic citation, as this does not fall under the “search incident to arrest” exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that the Fourth Amendment’s “search incident to arrest” exception does not extend to situations where an officer issues a citation in lieu of a custodial arrest.
Knowles v. Iowa Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Petitioner Knowles was stopped by an Iowa police officer for speeding. Under Iowa law, the officer had the authority to arrest Knowles but instead issued him a citation. Following the issuance of the citation, the officer conducted a full search of Knowles’s car without consent or probable cause, relying on an Iowa statute that permitted such searches incident to a citation. During the search, the officer found a bag of marijuana and a pipe under the driver’s seat. Knowles was then arrested and charged with state controlled substance violations. Knowles moved to suppress the evidence, arguing the search was unconstitutional because he had not been arrested. The Iowa trial court denied the motion, and the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed, upholding the search under a “search incident to citation” rationale, reasoning that probable cause to arrest was sufficient, even if no arrest occurred.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Fourth Amendment permit a police officer to conduct a full warrantless search of a vehicle incident to issuing a traffic citation when the officer does not make a custodial arrest?
No. The search of Knowles’s car violated the Fourth Amendment. The rationales Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip e
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Fourth Amendment permit a police officer to conduct a full warrantless search of a vehicle incident to issuing a traffic citation when the officer does not make a custodial arrest?
Conclusion
Knowles v. Iowa significantly limits the scope of the search incident to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vol
Legal Rule
A full search of a vehicle conducted by a police officer incident Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Legal Analysis
The Court, referencing *United States v. Robinson*, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), identified Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia dese
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Fourth Amendment does not permit a “search incident to citation.”