Connection lost
Server error
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court struck down Massachusetts’ regulations on tobacco advertising near schools, finding that federal law preempted the rules for cigarettes and that the First Amendment’s commercial speech doctrine invalidated the overly broad restrictions for other tobacco products.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies the rigorous application of the Central Hudson test’s “narrowly tailored” prong for commercial speech and establishes a broad reading of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act’s (FCLAA) express preemption clause concerning state advertising regulations.
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In 1999, the Massachusetts Attorney General promulgated regulations to curb underage tobacco use. The regulations prohibited outdoor advertising of cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, and cigars within a 1,000-foot radius of any school or playground. This included signs visible from outside a retail establishment. The regulations also mandated that any indoor, point-of-sale advertising for these products be placed at least five feet from the floor. A third set of rules banned self-service displays and required that all tobacco products be kept out of the reach of consumers, accessible only by store personnel. A group of tobacco manufacturers and retailers, including Lorillard Tobacco Co., challenged the regulations, arguing they were preempted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA) and violated the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech. The state’s asserted interest was the compelling need to prevent underage tobacco use.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Do state regulations restricting the location of tobacco advertising and the accessibility of tobacco products violate the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech or run afoul of federal preemption under the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act?
Yes. The FCLAA expressly preempts the state’s regulations on cigarette advertising. The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolo
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Do state regulations restricting the location of tobacco advertising and the accessibility of tobacco products violate the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech or run afoul of federal preemption under the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act?
Conclusion
This decision significantly limits states' ability to regulate tobacco advertising, both through Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliq
Legal Rule
Under the Supremacy Clause, a state law is preempted if it falls Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. L
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis proceeded in two parts. First, addressing preemption, the Court Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA) preempts state regulations