Connection lost
Server error
Marsh v. Arnot Ogden Medical Center Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A hospital, nurse, and physician sought to dismiss punitive damages claims after a nurse fatally administered insulin to a non-diabetic patient. The court reversed, finding the allegations of reckless conduct and systemic safety failures were sufficient to allow the punitive damages claims to proceed.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that in New York medical malpractice, conduct showing a “reckless indifference” to a patient’s rights, short of actual malice, is sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages. Systemic institutional failures can also form the basis for such an award.
Marsh v. Arnot Ogden Medical Center Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff’s decedent died while a patient at Arnot Ogden Medical Center (AOMC) after a nurse, Jane Doe, mistakenly administered insulin to him, a non-diabetic. Plaintiff alleged that immediately before the injection, the decedent’s daughter specifically warned Nurse Doe that the decedent was not diabetic and did not take insulin. Doe allegedly proceeded without confirming the patient’s identity or the physician’s order. After the error was discovered, the supervising physician, Dr. Abderhalden-Friend, was notified but allegedly did not come to the hospital to examine the patient. Instead, she directed staff by telephone to cease glucose monitoring until the next morning. Furthermore, the decedent’s medical chart was not updated to reflect the fatal medication error until four months after his death. A subsequent federal investigation revealed that AOMC had no system to identify patterns of medication errors by staff and that Nurse Doe had committed another medication error two months prior. The physician moved to dismiss the punitive damages claim, while the nurse and AOMC moved for partial summary judgment on the same claim.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: In a medical malpractice action, does conduct allegedly demonstrating reckless indifference—such as administering medication over a specific warning, failing to render aid after a known error, concealing the error in medical records, and systemic hospital safety failures—satisfy the standard to sustain a claim for punitive damages?
Yes. The court reversed the lower court’s order and denied the defendants’ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor i
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
In a medical malpractice action, does conduct allegedly demonstrating reckless indifference—such as administering medication over a specific warning, failing to render aid after a known error, concealing the error in medical records, and systemic hospital safety failures—satisfy the standard to sustain a claim for punitive damages?
Conclusion
This case establishes that in New York, a punitive damages claim in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris ni
Legal Rule
In a medical malpractice action, punitive damages may be recovered when a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse ci
Legal Analysis
The court analyzed the punitive damages claim against each defendant, finding sufficient Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est labo
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Punitive damages in a medical malpractice case require conduct showing “reckless
