Connection lost
Server error
McGirt v. Oklahoma Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that a vast area of eastern Oklahoma remains a Creek Nation reservation for federal criminal law purposes because Congress never explicitly disestablished it, thus barring state prosecution of a tribal member for crimes committed there.
Legal Significance: The case affirms that only an explicit act of Congress can disestablish an Indian reservation. It rejects arguments that historical practice, demographic changes, or allotment policies can implicitly terminate a reservation’s status, reinforcing the primacy of statutory text and treaty promises.
McGirt v. Oklahoma Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In 1997, Jimcy McGirt, an enrolled member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, was convicted in Oklahoma state court of serious sexual offenses. The crimes occurred within the historical boundaries of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s territory, which was established through a series of 19th-century treaties with the United States. These treaties “solemnly guarantied” the land to the Creek Nation as a “permanent home” that would be “forever set apart.” In postconviction proceedings, McGirt argued that the State of Oklahoma lacked jurisdiction to prosecute him. He contended that because he is an Indian and his crimes were committed within the boundaries of the Creek Reservation, the case fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government pursuant to the Major Crimes Act (MCA), 18 U.S.C. § 1153. The State of Oklahoma countered that the Creek Reservation had been disestablished by a series of congressional acts around the time of Oklahoma’s statehood, particularly those implementing the policy of allotting tribal lands to individual members. The state also pointed to over a century of its consistent exercise of criminal jurisdiction over the area as evidence of disestablishment. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals rejected McGirt’s claim, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the question of the reservation’s status.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did Congress disestablish the reservation of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, thereby giving Oklahoma jurisdiction to prosecute an enrolled tribal member for major crimes committed within the reservation’s historical boundaries?
No. The Court held that the land promised to the Creek Nation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Dui
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did Congress disestablish the reservation of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, thereby giving Oklahoma jurisdiction to prosecute an enrolled tribal member for major crimes committed within the reservation’s historical boundaries?
Conclusion
The decision solidifies a textualist approach to reservation disestablishment, requiring an explicit Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqu
Legal Rule
Once Congress establishes an Indian reservation, it retains that status until Congress Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fu
Legal Analysis
Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch employed a textualist approach focused exclusively Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum do
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Holding: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s reservation, covering a large part of