Connection lost
Server error
MEACHUM v. FANO Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that transferring a prisoner to a facility with substantially worse conditions does not trigger due process protections. A prisoner’s liberty interest is not inherent but must be created by a state law or practice that limits officials’ discretion to make such transfers.
Legal Significance: This case established the “state-created liberty interest” doctrine for prisoners. It holds that a constitutionally protected liberty interest, requiring due process, arises not from the Constitution itself but from state laws or regulations that place substantive limits on official discretion.
MEACHUM v. FANO Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Respondents were inmates at a medium-security Massachusetts prison. Following several serious fires, prison officials, acting on informant reports, suspected respondents’ involvement. A Classification Board conducted individual hearings to determine whether to transfer the inmates. At the hearings, respondents had counsel and could present evidence, but the informant testimony against them was heard by the Board in camera and was not disclosed. Based on these hearings, the Board recommended, and officials approved, the transfer of several respondents to maximum-security prisons where conditions were substantially less favorable. The transfers were not classified as disciplinary punishment and did not result in the loss of good-time credits. Respondents filed a § 1983 action, alleging the transfers without an adequate fact-finding hearing violated their Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. The lower courts agreed, finding that the transfer to a more burdensome institution constituted a “grievous loss” sufficient to trigger due process protections.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, in and of itself, create a liberty interest that entitles a state prisoner to a hearing before being transferred to another prison with substantially less favorable conditions, when state law places no substantive limitations on the discretion of prison officials to order such transfers?
No. The Court reversed, holding that the Due Process Clause does not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occae
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, in and of itself, create a liberty interest that entitles a state prisoner to a hearing before being transferred to another prison with substantially less favorable conditions, when state law places no substantive limitations on the discretion of prison officials to order such transfers?
Conclusion
This decision established that for a prisoner to claim a due process Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute
Legal Rule
A state prisoner has no liberty interest arising directly from the Due Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat
Legal Analysis
The Court began its analysis by rejecting the lower court's premise that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Due Process Clause does not, on its own, create a
