Case Citation
Legal Case Name

National Association of Home Builders v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, United States Department of Interior and Mollie Beattie, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit1997Docket #766913
130 F.3d 1041 327 U.S. App. D.C. 248 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20403 45 ERC (BNA) 1833 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34143

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: The D.C. Circuit upheld the Endangered Species Act’s application to a purely intrastate insect, finding Congress’s Commerce Clause power sufficient to regulate activities threatening its existence due to impacts on biodiversity and interstate competition.

Legal Significance: This case affirmed broad congressional power under the Commerce Clause to regulate intrastate activities affecting endangered species, even those with no direct commercial value, based on aggregate impacts on biodiversity and prevention of destructive interstate competition.

National Association of Home Builders v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, United States Department of Interior and Mollie Beattie, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) listed the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Fly), an insect species found exclusively within an eight-mile radius in California, as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This listing impacted San Bernardino County’s plans to construct a hospital and redesign a nearby intersection, as these activities were deemed likely to constitute a prohibited “take” of the Fly under ESA § 9(a)(1). The National Association of Home Builders and local government entities (Appellants) challenged this application of the ESA, arguing that regulating activities affecting a purely intrastate species with no apparent commercial value exceeded Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause. The Fly’s habitat had been reduced by over 97% due to urban development. The FWS had previously negotiated with the County regarding the hospital construction, leading to habitat set-asides, but the proposed intersection redesign threatened a critical habitat corridor. The district court granted summary judgment for the government, upholding the ESA’s application.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the application of Section 9(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act, prohibiting the “take” of an endangered species, to the purely intrastate Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly, exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause?

Affirmed. The application of ESA § 9(a)(1) to the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea com

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does the application of Section 9(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act, prohibiting the “take” of an endangered species, to the purely intrastate Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly, exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause?

Conclusion

The case establishes significant precedent for upholding federal environmental regulations, including the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore mag

Legal Rule

Congress may regulate activities under its Commerce Clause power if they involve: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vol

Legal Analysis

The D.C. Circuit, in Judge Wald's opinion, reasoned that ESA § 9(a)(1) Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in v

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The D.C. Circuit held that the Endangered Species Act’s (ESA) prohibition
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non pr

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is practice.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+