Connection lost
Server error
New York v. Ferber Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court upheld a New York law banning the distribution of child pornography, even if not legally obscene. The Court created a new category of unprotected speech, finding the state’s compelling interest in protecting children outweighs any First Amendment value of such materials.
Legal Significance: This case established that child pornography is a category of speech unprotected by the First Amendment, separate from the obscenity standard of Miller v. California. It allows states to prohibit such materials without proving they are obscene to protect children from sexual exploitation.
New York v. Ferber Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Paul Ferber, the proprietor of a Manhattan bookstore, sold two films depicting young boys masturbating to an undercover police officer. He was prosecuted under New York Penal Law § 263.15, which prohibits knowingly promoting a sexual performance by a child under sixteen, regardless of whether the material is legally obscene. A separate statute, § 263.10, specifically criminalized the promotion of obscene child pornography. Ferber was acquitted on the obscenity charges but convicted under § 263.15. The New York Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, holding that § 263.15 violated the First Amendment. The court found the statute unconstitutionally overbroad because it criminalized the distribution of materials that were not obscene under the standard established in Miller v. California and could potentially include works of educational or artistic value. The State of New York appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state statute that prohibits the knowing promotion of materials visually depicting sexual performances by children under sixteen, without requiring the material to be legally obscene, violate the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech?
No. The Court held that the New York statute is constitutional. The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a state statute that prohibits the knowing promotion of materials visually depicting sexual performances by children under sixteen, without requiring the material to be legally obscene, violate the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech?
Conclusion
The decision in *Ferber* created a new, distinct category of unprotected speech, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco la
Legal Rule
Child pornography is a category of material outside the protection of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Legal Analysis
The Court distinguished child pornography from obscenity, creating a new category of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolo
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Child pornography constitutes a distinct category of speech unprotected by the