Connection lost
Server error
Nix v. Williams Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Police violated a suspect’s right to counsel, leading to the discovery of a victim’s body. The Court held the evidence admissible because a search party would have inevitably discovered the body anyway, establishing the ‘inevitable discovery’ exception to the exclusionary rule.
Legal Significance: Formally established the ‘inevitable discovery’ doctrine as an exception to the exclusionary rule, allowing admission of illegally obtained evidence if the prosecution proves by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have been found through lawful means, without requiring a showing of police good faith.
Nix v. Williams Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Following the disappearance of a 10-year-old girl, police initiated a large-scale grid search involving 200 volunteers. The suspect, Robert Williams, surrendered to police in a different city. Williams’s attorney secured an agreement with police that they would not question him during his transport back to Des Moines. In violation of this agreement and Williams’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel, a detective elicited incriminating statements from Williams through the now-famous ‘Christian burial speech.’ These statements led police directly to the child’s body. At the time Williams revealed the location, the organized search party was only two and a half miles away and systematically approaching the area. The search was suspended upon Williams’s cooperation. At his second trial, the prosecution sought to admit evidence of the body’s location and condition, arguing that the search party would have found it regardless of Williams’s unconstitutionally obtained statements.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is evidence obtained as a direct result of a Sixth Amendment violation admissible if the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the evidence would have inevitably been discovered by lawful means?
Yes. The evidence pertaining to the discovery and condition of the victim’s Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Is evidence obtained as a direct result of a Sixth Amendment violation admissible if the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the evidence would have inevitably been discovered by lawful means?
Conclusion
This case solidified the inevitable discovery doctrine as a major exception to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad mini
Legal Rule
Under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule, evidence that would Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis extended the rationale of the 'independent source' doctrine, which Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat no
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Supreme Court formally adopted the inevitable discovery doctrine as an