Connection lost
Server error
Nixon v. Fitzgerald Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An Air Force analyst sued former President Nixon for retaliatory firing. The Supreme Court held that the President has absolute immunity from civil damages liability for actions taken within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official duties, based on the constitutional separation of powers.
Legal Significance: This case established the doctrine of absolute presidential immunity from civil damages for official acts. The Court grounded this immunity in the constitutional principle of separation of powers and the unique nature of the presidential office, distinguishing the President from all other executive officials.
Nixon v. Fitzgerald Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
A. Ernest Fitzgerald, a civilian management analyst for the Department of the Air Force, testified before a congressional subcommittee about significant cost overruns on the C-5A transport plane. Approximately one year later, his position was eliminated during a departmental reorganization, an action Fitzgerald alleged was retaliatory for his testimony. At a press conference, President Richard Nixon assumed personal responsibility for Fitzgerald’s dismissal, although the White House later retracted this statement. After the Civil Service Commission found his dismissal was improper and ordered his reinstatement, Fitzgerald filed a civil suit seeking damages from several officials, eventually naming former President Nixon as a defendant. Fitzgerald alleged a conspiracy to deprive him of his constitutional and statutory rights. Nixon moved for summary judgment, asserting that as President, he was entitled to absolute immunity from civil damages liability for his official acts. The District Court and the Court of Appeals rejected this claim, holding that the President was entitled only to qualified immunity.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is the President of the United States entitled to absolute immunity from civil damages liability for official acts committed while in office?
Yes. The President is entitled to absolute immunity from civil damages liability Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Is the President of the United States entitled to absolute immunity from civil damages liability for official acts committed while in office?
Conclusion
This landmark decision established absolute presidential immunity from civil damages for official Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Rule
The President of the United States is entitled to absolute immunity from Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, q
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis centered on the President's unique position within the constitutional Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deser
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The President of the United States has absolute immunity from civil