Connection lost
Server error
P. E. Sharpless Co. v. Crawford Farms, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A company patented a process for blending Roquefort and cream cheese. A competitor copied the process. The court upheld the process patent as a new and useful invention but rejected a related claim of unfair competition based on similar packaging.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that a process for preparing a food product can be a patentable “art” under patent law, provided it is a novel method that transforms ingredients to produce a new and useful result not previously known in the field.
P. E. Sharpless Co. v. Crawford Farms, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
P. E. Sharpless Co. held a patent for a process of creating a novel cheese product. The process consisted of combining approximately eight parts soft, uncured cream cheese with one part cured Roquefort cheese that had been dried and pulverized. The ingredients were blended in a mixer, cooled to restore density, and then molded. This specific method resulted in a homogeneous composition that retained the physical texture of cream cheese but was imbued with the flavor and preservative qualities of Roquefort, an outcome not previously achieved. Crawford Farms, Inc., a competitor, began producing and selling a similar cheese product. Sharpless sued for patent infringement, arguing Crawford Farms used a substantially identical process. Sharpless also brought an unfair competition claim, alleging Crawford’s tinfoil-wrapped packaging was confusingly similar to its own. Crawford Farms challenged the patent’s validity, asserting it was not a novel invention and citing prior instances where individuals had mixed the two cheeses for personal use and a prior British patent for a different cheese mixture.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a specific, multi-step method for blending two distinct types of cheese to create a new, homogeneous food product a patentable “art” or process under patent law, even if the individual components are well-known?
Yes. The court held that the specific process for creating the cheese Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Is a specific, multi-step method for blending two distinct types of cheese to create a new, homogeneous food product a patentable “art” or process under patent law, even if the individual components are well-known?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the principle that methods of preparing food can be Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis no
Legal Rule
A process is a patentable "art" if it constitutes a new and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Analysis
The court determined that the patented method was more than a mere Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A process for blending soft cream cheese with pulverized Roquefort cheese