Connection lost
Server error
Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: In a bidding war for Paramount between Viacom and QVC, the Delaware Supreme Court found Paramount’s board breached its fiduciary duties by using defensive measures to favor a lower-priced deal with Viacom, failing its obligation to secure the best value for shareholders in a sale of control.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that enhanced judicial scrutiny under Revlon applies not only to corporate break-ups but also to any transaction involving a sale or change of control, obligating directors to secure the best value reasonably available for stockholders.
Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Paramount board negotiated a strategic merger with Viacom. The deal would result in a change of control, as Viacom’s majority shareholder, Sumner Redstone, would become the controlling shareholder of the combined entity. The merger agreement included significant defensive measures: a no-shop provision restricting Paramount’s ability to entertain other offers, a $100 million termination fee, and a stock option agreement. The stock option allowed Viacom to purchase 19.9% of Paramount’s stock at a fixed price and contained ‘draconian’ terms, including a ‘Note Feature’ and an uncapped ‘Put Feature,’ which could cost Paramount hundreds of millions if another bidder succeeded. Subsequently, QVC Network launched an unsolicited, higher-value tender offer. The Paramount board, focused on its preferred strategic alliance with Viacom and believing it was contractually constrained, did not seriously engage with QVC. The board failed to renegotiate the defensive measures when it amended the Viacom agreement and ultimately rejected QVC’s facially superior offer, claiming it was illusory and conditional without adequate investigation. QVC sought an injunction against the Paramount-Viacom defensive measures.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: When a corporation undertakes a transaction that results in a change of corporate control from a fluid aggregation of public shareholders to a single controlling shareholder, are the directors required to seek the best value reasonably available to the stockholders, thereby triggering enhanced judicial scrutiny of their actions?
Yes. The court affirmed the preliminary injunction, holding that the Paramount board Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proi
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
When a corporation undertakes a transaction that results in a change of corporate control from a fluid aggregation of public shareholders to a single controlling shareholder, are the directors required to seek the best value reasonably available to the stockholders, thereby triggering enhanced judicial scrutiny of their actions?
Conclusion
This decision firmly establishes that a change-of-control transaction, even if styled as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labor
Legal Rule
When a corporation undertakes a transaction which will cause either (a) a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit ame
Legal Analysis
The Court subjected the Paramount board's actions to enhanced judicial scrutiny, rather Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Du
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A corporate transaction resulting in a change of control triggers enhanced