Connection lost
Server error
Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Minority stockholders sued a controlling stockholder for breach of fiduciary duty. The court held these claims, arising from corporate law, were not subject to a broad arbitration clause in the stock purchase agreement because the duties existed independently of the contract.
Legal Significance: Establishes that general, broad arbitration clauses in contracts do not, by themselves, waive a stockholder’s right to litigate distinct breach of fiduciary duty claims in court. Such duties are statutory and exist independently of the contract creating the stockholder relationship.
Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Parfi Holding AB and other minority stockholders (collectively “Parfi”) acquired shares in Mirror Image Internet, Inc. through an Underwriting Agreement. The agreement made Xeelera Inc. the controlling stockholder and contained a broad clause requiring arbitration for any claim “arising out of or in connection with” the agreement. After gaining control, Xeelera allegedly engaged in a series of self-dealing transactions, including stock subscriptions and a preferred stock offering at below-market prices, which diluted the minority’s interest. Xeelera also allegedly usurped a corporate opportunity in a subsequent sale of Mirror Image stock. Parfi initiated arbitration for breach of contract claims based on assurances made during the underwriting process. Separately, Parfi filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery, alleging that Xeelera, as the controlling stockholder, breached its fiduciary duties of loyalty and care owed to the minority stockholders under Delaware corporate law. The Court of Chancery dismissed the fiduciary duty claims, holding they were “in connection with” the Underwriting Agreement and thus subject to mandatory arbitration.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a broad contractual arbitration clause in an underwriting agreement compel stockholders to arbitrate claims for breach of fiduciary duty that arise from the controlling stockholder’s subsequent actions, even though such duties exist independently under corporate law?
No. The fiduciary duty claims are not subject to the arbitration clause. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a broad contractual arbitration clause in an underwriting agreement compel stockholders to arbitrate claims for breach of fiduciary duty that arise from the controlling stockholder’s subsequent actions, even though such duties exist independently under corporate law?
Conclusion
This case provides a crucial precedent protecting stockholders' rights to litigate fiduciary Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation
Legal Rule
A claim must be arbitrated only if it implicates the rights and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt
Legal Analysis
The Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery, establishing a clear Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A broad arbitration clause only covers disputes over rights created by