Connection lost
Server error
Pavan v. Smith Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Arkansas refused to list the non-birthing spouse of a same-sex couple on their child’s birth certificate, despite listing non-biological fathers for opposite-sex couples. The Supreme Court held this differential treatment unconstitutionally denies same-sex couples the rights and benefits of marriage established in Obergefell.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that Obergefell v. Hodges requires states to provide same-sex married couples with all benefits of marriage, including parental recognition on birth certificates, on the same terms as opposite-sex couples, even when biology is not the basis for parentage.
Pavan v. Smith Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Two same-sex couples, legally married in other states, each had a child in Arkansas. The children were conceived via anonymous sperm donation, and in each case, one of the female spouses was the birth mother. When the couples completed the birth certificate applications, they listed both spouses as parents. The Arkansas Department of Health, however, issued certificates listing only the birth mother’s name. This action was based on Ark. Code § 20-18-401, which provides that if a married woman gives birth, her “husband shall be entered on the certificate as the father of the child.” This statutory presumption of parentage for the husband applied regardless of his biological connection to the child, including in cases of artificial insemination with a donor. The state refused to extend this marital presumption of parentage to the non-birthing female spouse of a birth mother, thereby treating married same-sex couples differently from married opposite-sex couples in identical circumstances.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state law that denies a married same-sex couple the right to have both spouses listed on their child’s birth certificate, while affording that right to a similarly situated opposite-sex couple, violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses as interpreted in Obergefell v. Hodges?
Yes. The Court held that Arkansas’s differential treatment of same-sex married couples Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non pro
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a state law that denies a married same-sex couple the right to have both spouses listed on their child’s birth certificate, while affording that right to a similarly situated opposite-sex couple, violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses as interpreted in Obergefell v. Hodges?
Conclusion
*Pavan v. Smith* serves as a direct enforcement of *Obergefell*, confirming that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla
Legal Rule
Under *Obergefell v. Hodges*, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), the Constitution requires states Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse c
Legal Analysis
In a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court directly applied the precedent Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Under Obergefell v. Hodges, states must grant same-sex couples the same