Case Citation
Legal Case Name

People v. Robinson Case Brief

New York Court of Appeals1983Docket #62040375
60 N.Y.2d 982 459 N.E.2d 483 471 N.Y.S.2d 258 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3595 Criminal Law

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: Defendant helped friends strip tires from a car they had stolen the previous day. The court held he was not guilty of larceny because the crime was complete before his involvement began, making him a possessor of stolen goods, not a thief.

Legal Significance: This case clarifies the temporal scope of larceny for accomplice liability. A defendant must assist while the crime is in progress; once asportation has ceased, subsequent assistance constitutes a different crime, such as criminal possession of stolen property, not larceny.

People v. Robinson Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

An employee of a car dealership discovered that a new Lincoln Continental had been stolen. Later that day, police found the car abandoned some distance from the dealership. The wheels and tires, with an aggregate value of $750, were missing. The defendant’s fingerprints were found on the car’s rear fender skirts. In a statement to police, the defendant admitted that he knew the car had been stolen the previous night. He stated that he did not participate in the initial theft of the vehicle but, on the day after the theft, assisted two friends in removing the wheels and tires and loading them into their own car. The defendant was indicted for grand larceny in the third degree for the theft of the wheels and tires, not the car itself. At trial, the prosecution presented no evidence linking the defendant to the initial taking of the car from the dealership. The jury convicted the defendant, but the Appellate Division reversed, concluding the evidence was insufficient to establish larceny.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Can a defendant be convicted of larceny as an accomplice if their participation begins after the principal thieves have already completed the asportation of the stolen property and moved it to a new location?

No. The court affirmed the reversal of the defendant’s conviction, holding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offic

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Can a defendant be convicted of larceny as an accomplice if their participation begins after the principal thieves have already completed the asportation of the stolen property and moved it to a new location?

Conclusion

This case establishes a key distinction between being an accomplice to an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir

Legal Rule

A person is guilty of larceny as an accomplice only if they Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptat

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis centered on the temporal scope of larceny, specifically the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod t

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A person who helps remove parts from a stolen vehicle after
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?