Connection lost
Server error
Reynolds v. Sims Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that Alabama’s legislative apportionment scheme, which grossly overrepresented rural voters, violated the Equal Protection Clause. It established the “one person, one vote” principle, requiring that both houses of a state legislature be apportioned substantially equally based on population.
Legal Significance: This landmark case established the “one person, one vote” doctrine for state legislative apportionment. It held that the Equal Protection Clause requires representation in both houses of a bicameral state legislature to be based substantially on population, invalidating the “federal analogy” for state governments.
Reynolds v. Sims Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs, voters from Jefferson County, Alabama, challenged the apportionment of the Alabama Legislature, which had not been reapportioned since 1901, despite a state constitutional requirement for decennial reapportionment. Due to major population shifts from rural to urban areas over 60 years, the existing scheme resulted in severe malapportionment. For instance, in the state Senate, population-variance ratios were as high as 41-to-1. In the House, Bullock County (pop. 13,462) received two seats, while Mobile County (pop. 314,301) received only three. The existing plan allowed 25.1% of the population to elect a majority of senators and 25.7% to elect a majority of representatives. In response to the lawsuit, the legislature proposed two new plans: the “67-Senator Amendment,” which gave one senator to each of the 67 counties regardless of population, and the “Crawford-Webb Act,” which made only minor changes. A federal district court found the existing apportionment and both proposed plans unconstitutional for violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and ordered a temporary plan into effect.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment require that seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislature be apportioned substantially on a population basis?
Yes. The Court held that all three of Alabama’s apportionment schemes—the existing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment require that seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislature be apportioned substantially on a population basis?
Conclusion
Reynolds v. Sims fundamentally reshaped American politics by applying the "one person, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut
Legal Rule
The Equal Protection Clause requires that the seats in both houses of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercita
Legal Analysis
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Warren established that the right to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et d
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Holding: The Equal Protection Clause requires that seats in both houses
