Connection lost
Server error
Roe v. Wade Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A pregnant woman and a physician challenged Texas’s abortion ban. A federal court found the law unconstitutional, violating a fundamental right to privacy under the Ninth Amendment, but refused to block its enforcement, citing federalism concerns.
Legal Significance: This lower court decision established a Ninth Amendment right to abortion and found Texas’s law unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, setting the stage for the landmark Supreme Court ruling that would follow.
Roe v. Wade Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
A pregnant single woman, identified as “Jane Roe,” and a licensed physician, Dr. James Hallford, brought a suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Dallas County District Attorney. They sought a declaratory judgment that Texas’s criminal abortion statutes were unconstitutional and an injunction to prevent their enforcement. The challenged statutes criminalized procuring or attempting an abortion except on “medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” Roe, who was pregnant and wished to terminate her pregnancy, alleged the laws violated her fundamental right to choose whether to have children. Dr. Hallford, who faced potential prosecution under the statutes, argued that the laws infringed on his patients’ rights and were unconstitutionally vague, failing to provide clear notice of what conduct was criminal. The plaintiffs grounded their claim in a fundamental right of privacy protected by the Ninth Amendment, made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The state defended the statutes as a valid exercise of its police power to protect health and potential life.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Do Texas’s criminal abortion statutes, which prohibit all abortions except those necessary to save the mother’s life, unconstitutionally infringe upon the fundamental right to privacy protected by the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments and are they void for vagueness?
Yes. The court granted declaratory relief, holding that the Texas abortion laws Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Do Texas’s criminal abortion statutes, which prohibit all abortions except those necessary to save the mother’s life, unconstitutionally infringe upon the fundamental right to privacy protected by the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments and are they void for vagueness?
Conclusion
This decision was one of the first federal court rulings to declare Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis
Legal Rule
A state statute that infringes upon a fundamental personal right, such as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident,
Legal Analysis
The court first determined that Roe and Dr. Hallford had standing and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis no
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The court found a fundamental right to choose whether to have
