Connection lost
Server error
ROPER v. SIMMONS Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that executing individuals for crimes committed while under the age of 18 violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling established a categorical ban, citing an emerging national consensus and the inherent differences between juveniles and adults.
Legal Significance: This landmark decision established a categorical rule prohibiting capital punishment for juvenile offenders under 18. It solidified the “evolving standards of decency” doctrine, incorporating the Court’s independent judgment and international opinion as key components of Eighth Amendment analysis, and expressly overruled Stanford v. Kentucky.
ROPER v. SIMMONS Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
At age 17, Christopher Simmons planned and committed a murder, telling his friends they could “get away with it” because they were minors. Simmons and an accomplice broke into the victim’s home, bound her with duct tape and electrical wire, drove her to a state park, and threw her from a railroad trestle into a river, where she drowned. Simmons was tried as an adult, convicted, and sentenced to death. His age was presented as a mitigating factor, but the prosecutor argued it was aggravating. After the Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, which barred the execution of mentally retarded persons, Simmons filed a new petition. The Missouri Supreme Court set aside his death sentence, concluding that a national consensus had developed against executing juvenile offenders since the Court’s 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky, which had permitted the practice for 16- and 17-year-olds. The State of Missouri appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments, applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, forbid the imposition of the death penalty on an offender who was under 18 years of age when the crime was committed?
Yes. The Court held that executing juvenile offenders under 18 constitutes cruel Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments, applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, forbid the imposition of the death penalty on an offender who was under 18 years of age when the crime was committed?
Conclusion
*Roper v. Simmons* created a bright-line constitutional rule based on age, invalidating Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. D
Legal Rule
The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the imposition of the death penalty Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. U
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis followed its "evolving standards of decency" jurisprudence, which requires Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Holding: The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid imposing the death penalty