Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Salman v. United States Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States2016Docket #4548731
196 L. Ed. 2d 351 137 S. Ct. 420 2016 U.S. LEXIS 7418 85 U.S.L.W. 4015 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 402 2016 WL 7078448 Securities Regulation Corporations Criminal Law

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: An investment banker gave inside information to his brother as a gift. The Supreme Court held that giving a tip to a trading relative is a sufficient “personal benefit” to the tipper to support an insider trading conviction, even without any pecuniary gain.

Legal Significance: This case unanimously reaffirmed the “gift theory” of insider trading liability from Dirks v. SEC, clarifying that a tipper’s gift of confidential information to a trading relative or friend satisfies the personal benefit element without requiring proof of a pecuniary or tangible return to the tipper.

Salman v. United States Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Maher Kara, an investment banker at Citigroup, possessed material, nonpublic information regarding corporate mergers and acquisitions. Maher had a very close relationship with his brother, Michael Kara. Maher began providing confidential information to Michael with the intent to benefit him and with the expectation that Michael would trade on it. Maher testified he did so to “help” his brother and “fulfil whatever needs he had.” Michael, in turn, passed these tips to his friend and brother-in-law, Bassam Salman (the petitioner). Salman knew the information was confidential and that it originated from Maher. Acting on these tips, Salman made over $1.5 million in profits. Salman was convicted of conspiracy and securities fraud. He appealed, arguing that his conviction was invalid because the original tipper, Maher, did not receive a pecuniary or tangible benefit in exchange for the information, a standard articulated by the Second Circuit in United States v. Newman. The Ninth Circuit affirmed Salman’s conviction, creating a circuit split by declining to follow Newman‘s heightened standard.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a corporate insider receive the requisite “personal benefit” for tipper-tippee insider trading liability by gifting confidential information to a trading relative or friend, even if the insider receives nothing of a pecuniary or tangible nature in return?

Yes. A tipper’s gift of confidential information to a trading relative or Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a corporate insider receive the requisite “personal benefit” for tipper-tippee insider trading liability by gifting confidential information to a trading relative or friend, even if the insider receives nothing of a pecuniary or tangible nature in return?

Conclusion

The Court's decision in *Salman* resolved a critical circuit split by reaffirming Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitati

Legal Rule

Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatu

Legal Analysis

The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit's decision, adhering strictly to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A gift of confidential information to a trading relative or friend
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

It's every lawyer's dream to help shape the law, not just react to it.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+