Connection lost
Server error
United States v. Apple, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Apple orchestrated a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among e-book publishers to eliminate retail price competition from Amazon. The Second Circuit affirmed that this “hub-and-spoke” conspiracy was a per se violation of the Sherman Act, rejecting Apple’s pro-competitive justifications.
Legal Significance: The case affirms that a vertical actor (the “hub”) can be held liable under the per se rule for organizing a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among its suppliers (the “spokes”), even if its own agreements are vertical and it claims pro-competitive motives like facilitating market entry.
United States v. Apple, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In 2009, Amazon dominated the e-book market, selling bestsellers for $9.99, often below its wholesale cost. Major publishers feared this pricing model threatened their hardcover sales and long-term pricing power. Apple, preparing to launch the iPad and its iBookstore, sought to enter the market without matching Amazon’s loss-leading prices. Apple negotiated with five of the six largest publishers, proposing an “agency model” where publishers set retail prices and Apple took a 30% commission. A key term was a Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) clause, which required publishers to match the lowest retail price offered by any competitor. This MFN created a powerful economic incentive for publishers to collectively force Amazon and other retailers to adopt the agency model, thereby eliminating retail price competition and raising e-book prices market-wide. The district court found that Apple actively facilitated communication and coordination among the publishers to ensure they acted in unison against Amazon. Following the agreements, the publishers successfully moved Amazon to an agency model, and consumer e-book prices for their titles rose significantly.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did a company acting as a vertical “hub” commit a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act by knowingly organizing a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among its suppliers (the “spokes”) to eliminate retail price competition?
Yes. The court affirmed the district court’s judgment, holding that Apple orchestrated Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugia
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did a company acting as a vertical “hub” commit a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act by knowingly organizing a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among its suppliers (the “spokes”) to eliminate retail price competition?
Conclusion
This decision solidifies the principle that a vertical market participant acting as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute i
Legal Rule
A vertical actor that organizes a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among its suppliers Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fu
Legal Analysis
The Second Circuit rejected Apple's argument that its conduct should be analyzed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla par
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Apple orchestrated a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy among major publishers to end