Head-to-head · 212 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 95% chose HLS. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 212 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose HLS
Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025
per yearCross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award
View all-time (905 cross-admits)
Trend · HLS's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About HLS vs CLS
Across 212 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 95% enrolled at Harvard University and 5% at Columbia University. The split has shifted -1 points across the tracked cycles.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares Harvard University and Columbia University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 212 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 212 applicants admitted to both schools, 95% chose to attend Harvard University. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
Both schools are closely ranked in U.S. News: #6 and #9, separated by just 3 positions, making cross-admit data especially useful for deciding between them.
Harvard University is located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, while Columbia University is in New York City, New York. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: Columbia University places 70.1% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 53.5% for the other school. This 17 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, Harvard University has lower tuition at $77,100 per year compared to $85,368. Combined with employment rates of 96.7% (HLS) and 97.2% (CLS), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants who enrolled, those choosing Columbia University reported a higher median scholarship — $226,716 versus $120,000 over three years — though aid is one of several factors behind the enrollment decision.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram