Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Head-to-head · 37 cross-admits

When applicants got into both, 81% chose CLS. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 37 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.

Choice, not ranking

These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.

37
cross-admits
17
cycles
+11pt
YoY shift

Cross-admit decision

Of 37 applicants admitted to both schools
Last 5 cycles
Columbia University logo Chose CLS
81%
Chose UT University of Texas at Austin logo
19%

Median scholarship (chose CLS)

$95,000 / yr

Median scholarship (chose UT)

$96,000 / yr
View all-time (129 cross-admits)
88% chose CLS 12% chose UT

Trend · CLS's share

2005–2025

Lowest cycle

67%

Highest cycle

100%
17 cycles
100 50 0 05 07 08 09 10 11 12 14 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2005: 80% 2007: 100% 2008: 100% 2009: 80% 2010: 75% 2011: 100% 2012: 80% 2014: 83% 2016: 100% 2017: 100% 2019: 100% 2020: 91% 2021: 67% 2022: 89% 2023: 80% 2024: 67% 2025: 91%
CLS #5 · UT #15 LSD n≈6/yr

Admissions

Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
2026 ABA 509
Metric
Columbia University logo
CLS
New York City, New York
University of Texas at Austin logo
UT
Austin, Texas
USN Rank
#9
#16
LSD Rank
#5 (2.285)
#15 (0.165)
LSAT 25th
-
-
LSAT Median
-
-
LSAT 75th
-
-
GPA Median
-
-
Acceptance Rate
-
-
Class Size
-
-
Yield Rate
-
-

Financial

Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden
2026 ABA 509
Metric
Columbia University logo
CLS
New York City, New York
University of Texas at Austin logo
UT
Austin, Texas
Tuition (In-State)
-
-
Tuition (Out-of-State)
-
-
Median Grant
-
-
% Receiving Grants
-
-
Avg. Debt at Graduation
-
-

Employment & outcomes

Post-graduation placement and bar passage
2025 ABA Employment
Metric
Columbia University logo
CLS
New York City, New York
University of Texas at Austin logo
UT
Austin, Texas
BigLaw (501+)
70.1%
39.3%
Judicial Clerkships
5.7%
18.2%
Median Salary (Private)
-
-
Employment Rate
97.2%
99.4%
Bar Pass Rate
94.7%
96.4%

Overview

About CLS vs UT

Across 37 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 81% enrolled at Columbia University and 19% at University of Texas at Austin. The split has shifted +11 points across the tracked cycles.

These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.

Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.

Deciding between CLS and UT? Work with a consultant who knows both — backed by this exact data.
Join waitlist →

Compare another pair

vs
Detailed comparison narrative

This page compares Columbia University and University of Texas at Austin across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 37 applicants admitted to both.

Based on 37 applicants admitted to both schools, 81% chose to attend Columbia University. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.

In the U.S. News rankings, Columbia University is ranked #9 compared to #16 — a gap of 7 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.

Columbia University is located in New York City, New York, while University of Texas at Austin is in Austin, Texas. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.

Employment outcomes differ substantially: Columbia University places 70.1% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 39.3% for the other school. This 31 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.