Head-to-head · 61 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 97% chose UT. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 61 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose TAMU
Median scholarship (chose TAMU)
Median scholarship (chose UT)
View all-time (83 cross-admits)
Trend · TAMU's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About TAMU vs UT
Across 61 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 3% enrolled at Texas A&M University and 97% at University of Texas at Austin.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares Texas A&M University and University of Texas at Austin across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 61 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 61 applicants admitted to both schools, 97% chose to attend University of Texas at Austin. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Texas at Austin is ranked #16 compared to #22 — a gap of 6 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
Both schools are located in Texas — Texas A&M University in Fort Worth and University of Texas at Austin in Austin — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Texas at Austin places 39.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 14.5% for the other school. This 25 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, Texas A&M University has lower tuition at $32,634 per year compared to $38,236. Combined with employment rates of 99.2% (TAMU) and 99.4% (UT), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram