Head-to-head · 31 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 100% chose USC. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 31 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose Loyola Marymount
Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025
per yearCross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award
View all-time (80 cross-admits)
Trend · Loyola Marymount's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About Loyola Marymount vs USC
Across 31 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 0% enrolled at Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles and 100% at University of Southern California.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles and University of Southern California across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 31 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 31 applicants admitted to both schools, 100% chose to attend University of Southern California. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Southern California is ranked #26 compared to #70 — a gap of 44 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of Southern California has a median LSAT of 169 compared to 163, a gap of 6 points. This suggests applicants to University of Southern California face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of Southern California is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 11.2% compared to Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles's 26.1%.
Both schools are located in California — Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles in Los Angeles and University of Southern California in Los Angeles — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Southern California places 58.6% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 16.3% for the other school. This 42 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles has lower tuition at $70,360 per year compared to $84,034. Combined with employment rates of 91.0% (Loyola Marymount) and 96.9% (USC), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram