Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Head-to-head · 22 cross-admits

When applicants got into both, 100% chose UMich. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 22 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.

Choice, not ranking

These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.

22
cross-admits
2
cycles
+0pt
YoY shift

Cross-admit decision

Of 22 applicants admitted to both schools
Last 5 cycles
University of Michigan logo Chose UMich
100%
Chose TAMU Texas A&M University logo
0%

Median scholarship (chose UMich)

$90,000 / yr

Median scholarship (chose TAMU)

$58,916 / yr
View all-time (24 cross-admits)
100% chose UMich 0% chose TAMU

Trend · UMich's share

2024–2025
100%
every cycle (2)
100 50 0 24 25 2024: 100% 2025: 100%
UMich #9 · TAMU #38 LSD n≈7/yr

Admissions

Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
2026 ABA 509
Metric
University of Michigan logo
UMich
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Texas A&M University logo
TAMU
Fort Worth, Texas
USN Rank
#9
#22
LSD Rank
#9 (1.113)
#38 (0.012)
LSAT 25th
-
-
LSAT Median
-
-
LSAT 75th
-
-
GPA Median
-
-
Acceptance Rate
-
-
Class Size
-
-
Yield Rate
-
-

Financial

Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden
2026 ABA 509
Metric
University of Michigan logo
UMich
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Texas A&M University logo
TAMU
Fort Worth, Texas
Tuition (In-State)
-
-
Tuition (Out-of-State)
-
-
Median Grant
-
-
% Receiving Grants
-
-
Avg. Debt at Graduation
-
-

Employment & outcomes

Post-graduation placement and bar passage
2025 ABA Employment
Metric
University of Michigan logo
UMich
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Texas A&M University logo
TAMU
Fort Worth, Texas
BigLaw (501+)
54.5%
14.5%
Judicial Clerkships
15.7%
10.5%
Median Salary (Private)
-
-
Employment Rate
97.7%
99.2%
Bar Pass Rate
94.2%
95.3%

Overview

About UMich vs TAMU

Across 22 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 100% enrolled at University of Michigan and 0% at Texas A&M University.

These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.

Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.

Deciding between UMich and TAMU? Work with a consultant who knows both — backed by this exact data.
Join waitlist →

Compare another pair

vs
Detailed comparison narrative

This page compares University of Michigan and Texas A&M University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 22 applicants admitted to both.

Based on 22 applicants admitted to both schools, 100% chose to attend University of Michigan. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.

In the U.S. News rankings, University of Michigan is ranked #9 compared to #22 — a gap of 13 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.

University of Michigan is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, while Texas A&M University is in Fort Worth, Texas. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.

Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Michigan places 54.5% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 14.5% for the other school. This 40 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.

Among cross-admitted applicants, University of Michigan offered a median scholarship of $90,000 compared to $58,916, a difference of $31,084 that may factor into enrollment decisions.