Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram

Head-to-head · 14 cross-admits

When applicants got into both, 79% chose UH. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 14 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.

Choice, not ranking

These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.

14
cross-admits

Cross-admit decision

Of 14 applicants admitted to both schools
Last 5 cycles
University of Houston logo Chose UH
79%
Chose Texas Tech Texas Tech University logo
21%

Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025

per year
$11,500
74.0% get a grant
$34,551 net tuition
$12,000
88.0% get a grant
$21,840 net tuition

Cross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award

$22,500
n = 10
—
n < 5
View all-time (41 cross-admits)
76% chose UH 24% chose Texas Tech
Rank summary
UH
#79
LSD
USN #54
Texas Tech
#89
LSD
USN #85
LSD rank reflects where admitted applicants actually enroll. USN ranks come from US News.

Admissions

Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
2025 ABA 509
Metric
University of Houston logo
UH
Houston, Texas
Texas Tech University logo
Texas Tech
Lubbock, Texas
USN Rank
#54
#85
LSD Rank
75+ (0.003)
75+ (0.003)
LSAT 25th
160
157
LSAT Median
163
159
LSAT 75th
165
160
GPA Median
3.79
3.69
Acceptance Rate
23.0%
25.6%
Class Size
249
168
Yield Rate
30.5%
32.6%

Financial

Sticker price and scholarship aid
2025 ABA 509
Metric
University of Houston logo
UH
Houston, Texas
Texas Tech University logo
Texas Tech
Lubbock, Texas
Tuition (In-State)
$31,326
$22,590
Sticker Tuition
$46,051
$33,840
Median Grant
$11,500
$12,000
% Receiving Grants
74.0%
88.0%

Employment & outcomes

Post-graduation placement and bar passage
2025 ABA Employment
Metric
University of Houston logo
UH
Houston, Texas
Texas Tech University logo
Texas Tech
Lubbock, Texas
BigLaw (501+)
25.6%
4.4%
Federal Clerkships
1.7%
0.7%
State & Local Clerkships
1.3%
1.5%
NALP Median Salary (Private)
$190,000
-
Employment Rate
91.6%
93.4%
Bar Pass Rate
88.6%
86.3%

Overview

About UH vs Texas Tech

Across 14 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 79% enrolled at University of Houston and 21% at Texas Tech University.

These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.

Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.

Deciding between UH and Texas Tech? Work with a consultant who knows both — backed by this exact data.
Join waitlist →

Compare another pair

vs
Detailed comparison narrative

This page compares University of Houston and Texas Tech University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes using official ABA 509 disclosures.

In the U.S. News rankings, University of Houston is ranked #54 compared to #85 — a gap of 31 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.

There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of Houston has a median LSAT of 163 compared to 159, a gap of 4 points. This suggests applicants to University of Houston face a more competitive admissions pool.

Both schools are located in Texas — University of Houston in Houston and Texas Tech University in Lubbock — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.

Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Houston places 25.6% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 4.4% for the other school. This 21 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.

On cost, Texas Tech University has lower tuition at $33,840 per year compared to $46,051. Combined with employment rates of 91.6% (UH) and 93.4% (Texas Tech), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.