Head-to-head · 39 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 100% chose UT. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 39 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UT
Median scholarship (chose UT)
Median scholarship (chose UH)
View all-time (143 cross-admits)
Trend · UT's share
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UT vs UH
Across 39 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 100% enrolled at University of Texas at Austin and 0% at University of Houston.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of Texas at Austin and University of Houston across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 39 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 39 applicants admitted to both schools, 100% chose to attend University of Texas at Austin. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Texas at Austin is ranked #16 compared to #54 — a gap of 38 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of Texas at Austin has a median LSAT of 172 compared to 163, a gap of 9 points. This suggests applicants to University of Texas at Austin face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of Texas at Austin is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 14.0% compared to University of Houston's 23.0%.
Both schools are located in Texas — University of Texas at Austin in Austin and University of Houston in Houston — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Texas at Austin places 42.5% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 22.3% for the other school. This 20 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
Among cross-admitted applicants, University of Texas at Austin offered a median scholarship of $57,000 compared to $39,750, a difference of $17,250 that may factor into enrollment decisions.