Head-to-head · 37 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 86% chose UT. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 37 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UMN
Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025
per yearCross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award
View all-time (87 cross-admits)
Trend · UMN's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UMN vs UT
Across 37 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 14% enrolled at University of Minnesota and 86% at University of Texas at Austin. The split has shifted +13 points across the tracked cycles.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of Minnesota and University of Texas at Austin across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 37 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 37 applicants admitted to both schools, 87% chose to attend University of Texas at Austin. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Texas at Austin is ranked #16 compared to #22 — a gap of 6 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
University of Texas at Austin is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 14.0% compared to University of Minnesota's 26.7%.
University of Minnesota is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, while University of Texas at Austin is in Austin, Texas. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Texas at Austin places 39.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 17.6% for the other school. This 22 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of Texas at Austin has lower tuition at $38,236 per year compared to $51,440. Combined with employment rates of 95.5% (UMN) and 99.4% (UT), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants who enrolled, those choosing University of Minnesota reported a higher median scholarship — $105,000 versus $84,000 over three years — though aid is one of several factors behind the enrollment decision.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram