Head-to-head · 65 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 99% chose UMich. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 65 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UMich
Median scholarship (chose UMich)
Median scholarship (chose UMN)
View all-time (147 cross-admits)
Trend · UMich's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UMich vs UMN
Across 65 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 99% enrolled at University of Michigan and 1% at University of Minnesota.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of Michigan and University of Minnesota across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 65 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 65 applicants admitted to both schools, 99% chose to attend University of Michigan. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Michigan is ranked #9 compared to #22 — a gap of 13 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
University of Michigan is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 8.6% compared to University of Minnesota's 26.7%.
University of Michigan is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan, while University of Minnesota is in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Michigan places 50.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 16.1% for the other school. This 34 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of Minnesota has lower tuition at $51,440 per year compared to $76,108. Combined with employment rates of 95.0% (UMich) and 95.2% (UMN), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.