Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

abstractions test

Read a random definition: rule of 72

A quick definition of abstractions test:

Abstractions Test: A way to check if something has been copied without permission. It looks at whether the actual words or pictures have been copied, or if the ideas behind them are just similar. It's not a clear rule, but a way to compare the details and concepts in both works. This helps to decide if the original work has been copied or not.

A more thorough explanation:

The Abstractions Test is a way to determine if a work of art or literature has been copied from another work. It compares the actual substance of the two works to see if they share the same abstract ideas or if the substance has been copied.

The Abstractions Test was first introduced by Judge Learned Hand in the case of Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp. in 1930. It is not a bright-line test, but rather an approach to discerning the boundaries of protectable expression by isolating and comparing each level of abstraction in the two works, from the lowest (most detailed) to the highest (most conceptual).

For example, if a writer creates a story about a young wizard attending a school for magic, and another writer creates a story about a young witch attending a school for magic, the Abstractions Test would compare the substance of the two works to see if they share the same abstract idea of a young person attending a school for magic, or if the substance has been copied.

Another example would be if a musician creates a song with a specific melody and lyrics, and another musician creates a song with a similar melody and lyrics. The Abstractions Test would compare the substance of the two songs to see if they share the same abstract idea or if the substance has been copied.

The Abstractions Test is an important tool in determining if a work has been copied or if it is an original creation.

abstraction-filtration-comparison test | abstract juridical act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.