Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

abuse of discovery

Read a random definition: law martial

A quick definition of abuse of discovery:

Abuse of discovery is when someone misuses or overuses the process of gathering information in a legal case. This can happen when someone asks for too much information that is not needed or tries to use the process to harass or obstruct their opponent. It can also happen when someone does not respond properly to requests for information. Basically, it means not following the rules of the legal process when trying to get information for a case.

A more thorough explanation:

Abuse of discovery is when someone misuses or overuses the process of discovery in a legal case. Discovery is when both sides of a case exchange information and evidence before the trial. This helps each side prepare their case and prevents surprises during the trial.

Examples of abuse of discovery include:

  • Making requests for information that is not necessary or allowed
  • Conducting discovery for an improper purpose, such as to harass or obstruct the other side
  • Asking for more discovery than is necessary or appropriate for the case
  • Not responding adequately to proper discovery requests

For example, if a plaintiff in a personal injury case requests the defendant's medical records from the past 10 years, even though the injury occurred only 2 years ago, this would be an overbroad request and an abuse of discovery. It is not necessary or relevant to the case.

Another example would be if a defendant in a criminal case requests the victim's personal diary, even though it has nothing to do with the crime they are accused of. This would be an improper request and an abuse of discovery.

abusee | abuse of rights

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.