Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

abuse-of-rights doctrine

Read a random definition: salvage service

A quick definition of abuse-of-rights doctrine:

The abuse-of-rights doctrine is a rule in civil law that says if someone uses their legal rights to purposely harm someone else, without a good reason or against moral rules, they can be held responsible for the harm they caused. Basically, just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean you can use it to hurt others or act unfairly.

A more thorough explanation:

The abuse-of-rights doctrine is a principle in civil law that states a person may be held responsible for any harm caused by exercising their legal rights if:

  1. Their primary motive is to cause harm
  2. They have no legitimate interest in exercising their right
  3. Their actions go against moral rules, good faith, or fairness
  4. They use their right for a purpose other than its intended legal purpose

For example, if a property owner has the legal right to cut down trees on their land, but they do so solely to block their neighbor's view, they could be held liable for any damage caused by the falling trees. This is because their primary motive was to cause harm, and they had no legitimate interest in cutting down the trees.

Another example could be a person who uses their legal right to free speech to spread false and harmful rumors about someone else. In this case, their actions would go against moral rules and fairness, and they could be held responsible for any harm caused by their words.

abuse of rights | abuse of the elderly

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.