Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

accounts receivable

Read a random definition: littus maris

A quick definition of accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable (also known as A/R) is money that a business is owed by another business or person for goods or services that were provided on credit. This means that the customer did not pay right away, but instead agreed to pay at a later time. The business keeps track of these owed payments in their books as accounts receivable. Once the customer pays the full amount owed, the accounts receivable is replaced with cash.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Accounts receivable (A/R) is the money that a business is owed by another business or individual for goods or services provided on credit. When a business sends an invoice to a customer, it creates an accounts receivable. This is recorded as a current asset on the business's balance sheet.

Example: A restaurant supply shop sells $10,000 worth of equipment to a restaurant on credit. As soon as the equipment is delivered to the restaurant, the business records an accounts receivable on its books. Once the restaurant makes the full payment (in whatever time frame set out under the terms of the agreement), the accounts receivable is essentially replaced with cash.

Legal Example: In the case of United States v. Berg, accounts receivables were used in a legal setting. The defendant was accused of fraudulently inflating the accounts receivable of his business to obtain a loan. This case illustrates the importance of accurately recording accounts receivable and the consequences of fraudulent behavior.

Overall, accounts receivable is an important aspect of a business's financial health. It represents money that is owed to the business and can impact cash flow and profitability.

accounting | accredited investor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.