Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

acknowledgment

Read a random definition: originator

A quick definition of acknowledgment:

Term: Acknowledgment

Definition: Acknowledgment is when someone declares in front of an important person that they have signed a legal paper. This means they are saying that they did it on their own and it is real. Sometimes, acknowledgment can also mean admitting that you owe someone money or that a child belongs to a certain father.

A more thorough explanation:

Acknowledgment is a formal declaration made before an official that confirms the execution of a legal document. It is a way of verifying that the person who signed the document did so voluntarily and that they understand the contents of the document.

  • Legal Documents: When someone signs a legal document, such as a contract or a deed, they may need to acknowledge it before a notary public or other authorized official. This involves declaring that they signed the document of their own free will and that they understand its contents.
  • Limitation of Actions: In some cases, acknowledging a debt or obligation can stop the clock on the statute of limitations. For example, if someone owes money but hasn't made a payment in a long time, acknowledging the debt could prevent it from being discharged due to the statute of limitations.
  • Family Law: When a man publicly acknowledges a child as his own, he is legally recognized as the child's father. This can have implications for child support, custody, and other family law matters.

These examples illustrate how acknowledgment is used in different legal contexts to verify the authenticity of a document or to establish legal rights and obligations.

acknowledged father | acquisition of citizenship

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.