Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

limitation of actions

Read a random definition: tax assessment

A quick definition of limitation of actions:

Limitation of actions refers to the time limit set by law for a person to bring a legal claim or lawsuit against someone else. This time limit is also known as the statute of limitations or statute of repose. Once the time limit has passed, the person can no longer bring a legal claim or lawsuit. It is important to be aware of these time limits to ensure that legal rights are protected and not lost due to delay.

A more thorough explanation:

Limitation of actions refers to the time limit within which a legal action can be brought. This is governed by the statute of limitations and statute of repose.

The statute of limitations sets a time limit for bringing a legal action after a cause of action arises. For example, if someone is injured in a car accident, they may have a certain number of years to file a lawsuit against the driver who caused the accident. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the injured person can no longer bring a legal action.

The statute of repose, on the other hand, sets a time limit for bringing a legal action based on the date of a particular event, regardless of when the cause of action arises. For example, a statute of repose may limit the time within which a person can bring a lawsuit against a construction company for a defect in a building, regardless of when the defect was discovered.

Both the statute of limitations and statute of repose serve to protect defendants from being sued for events that occurred too long ago, when evidence may be difficult to gather or memories may have faded. They also provide certainty and finality to legal disputes, allowing parties to move on with their lives.

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 | limited equity housing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.