LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

action for declaratory

Read a random definition: reasonable royalty

A quick definition of action for declaratory:

An action for declaratory is a legal process where someone goes to court to establish their legal rights or status. It is a type of lawsuit that seeks a declaration from the court about a particular matter. This can be used to clarify legal issues or to resolve disputes before they become bigger problems. It is like asking a teacher to explain the rules so everyone knows what to do.

A more thorough explanation:

An action for declaratory is a legal proceeding in which a party seeks a court's declaration of their legal rights or status. It is also known as an action of declarator. This type of action is used to clarify legal issues or disputes before they escalate into more serious problems.

For example, a company may file an action for declaratory relief to determine whether a particular patent is valid or not. This can help the company avoid potential infringement claims and costly litigation. Another example is a person filing an action for declaratory relief to determine their legal rights in a property dispute.

Overall, an action for declaratory relief is a proactive legal measure that can help parties avoid future legal disputes by clarifying their legal rights and obligations.

action for declarator | action for money had and received

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

texaslawhopefully

22:30

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:31

yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca

renard99

22:31

@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all

texaslawhopefully

22:31

Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex

Eggan

22:31

waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:32

^^^^ truuuuuu

Eggan

22:32

there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol

Eggan

22:32

personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:32

i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions

texaslawhopefully

22:32

Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)

Eggan

22:33

when tex goes to ithaca i want to come

Dkk

22:34

Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

and it was a lil baby noodle cup

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:35

vvv hungry

Eggan

22:36

curry tonkatsu so yummeh

Eggan

22:36

whats even open rn? pizza?

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

22:36

CTB is it i think

Eggan

22:37

is collegetown pizza not open

Eggan

22:37

i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant

Dkk

22:48

Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.

JeremyFragrance

22:54

agreed

texaslawhopefully

22:55

This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/

Dkk

23:01

I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

23:02

ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

23:02

i am not that sympathetic to him

Dkk

23:04

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.

Dkk

23:05

Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.

texaslawhopefully

23:05

@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.

Dkk

23:06

Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.