Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

advertising

Read a random definition: receiving

A quick definition of advertising:

Advertising: Advertising is when a company tries to get people to notice and buy their product by showing it to them in different ways. This can include making commercials on TV or the internet, putting up posters or billboards, or even just having a catchy jingle. There are different types of advertising, like when a company talks about how their product is better than another company's product, or when they just want to remind people that their product exists. Some advertising is meant to give information about the product, like how good it is or what it's made of.

A more thorough explanation:

Advertising is the act of getting people's attention to promote the sale of something. It can also refer to the business of creating and distributing advertisements.

  • Comparative advertising: This is when an advertisement directly compares the advertised product with another brand of the same product. For example, a commercial for Pepsi might compare its taste to that of Coca-Cola.
  • Competitive advertising: This type of advertising doesn't provide much information about the product, but is used to maintain a share of the market. For example, a company might run an ad just to remind people that their product exists.
  • Informative advertising: This type of advertising provides information about the quality and suitability of a product. For example, an ad for a new car might highlight its safety features and fuel efficiency.

These types of advertising illustrate how companies use different strategies to promote their products and maintain their position in the market.

advertent negligence | advertising injury

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.