Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

agreement of rescission

Read a random definition: evidence of indebtedness

A quick definition of agreement of rescission:

An agreement of rescission is when two people agree to cancel a contract they made before. This can happen if one person breaks the rules of the contract or if they both decide they don't want to do it anymore. When they cancel the contract, they have to give back anything they got from each other. Sometimes a court can make them cancel the contract if it's not fair.

A more thorough explanation:

An agreement of rescission is a legal term that refers to an agreement between two parties to terminate a contract and discharge all remaining duties of performance. This can happen for various reasons, such as a breach of contract or a mutual decision to end the agreement.

For example, if two parties enter into a contract for the sale of goods, but one party fails to deliver the goods as promised, the other party may seek rescission of the contract. This would involve terminating the contract and returning any partial performance, such as a deposit or payment, to restore the parties to their pre-contractual positions.

Rescission can also be decreed by a court of equity, which is a court that can provide remedies beyond what is available in a court of law. In this case, the court may order rescission if it determines that the contract was entered into under duress, fraud, or other circumstances that make it unfair or unjust.

It's important to note that rescission is generally only available as a remedy or defense for a non-defaulting party. In other words, if one party breaches the contract, the other party may seek rescission, but the breaching party cannot use rescission as a defense.

agreement of imperfect obligation | agreement of sale

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.