Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

agreement to sell

Read a random definition: exposure of person

A quick definition of agreement to sell:

An agreement is when two or more people agree on something they will do or not do. It can be about things that happened in the past or things they will do in the future. Sometimes an agreement is called a contract, but not all agreements are contracts. A contract is a special kind of agreement that creates a legal obligation. There are many different kinds of agreements, like agreements to sell something, agreements about marriage or divorce, or agreements between countries. Some agreements are enforceable by law, which means that if someone breaks the agreement, they can get in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

An agreement to sell is a mutual understanding between two or more people about their rights and duties regarding past or future performances. It is a manifestation of mutual assent by two or more persons. The parties' actual bargain is found in their language or by implication from other circumstances, including course of dealing, usage of trade, and course of performance.

For example, if John agrees to sell his car to Jane for $10,000, and Jane agrees to buy the car for that price, they have entered into an agreement to sell. This agreement is not a contract until the terms are finalized and the sale is completed.

Another example is a property settlement agreement in a divorce case. The agreement outlines the terms of the division of property and assets between the spouses. Once both parties agree to the terms, it becomes a binding agreement.

In summary, an agreement to sell is a preliminary agreement that outlines the terms of a sale. It is not a contract until the terms are finalized and the sale is completed.

agreement to marry | agri

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.