Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

all-holders rule

Read a random definition: blank indorsement

A quick definition of all-holders rule:

The all-holders rule is a regulation that applies to securities. It has two parts. The first part says that if a company wants to offer shares to some of its shareholders, it must offer them to all of them. The second part says that if someone wants to buy a company, they must offer to buy shares from all of the company's shareholders, not just some of them. This rule helps ensure fairness and equal treatment for all shareholders.

A more thorough explanation:

The all-holders rule is a regulation set by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that has two main applications:

  1. It prohibits a company from offering shares to only some of the holders of a particular class of shares. In other words, if a company wants to issue new shares, it must offer them to all shareholders of that class, not just a select few.
  2. It requires a tender offeror (a company or individual attempting to acquire a controlling interest in another company) to make their offer to all shareholders of the target company, not just a select few.

For example, let's say Company A has two classes of shares: Class A and Class B. If Company A wants to issue new shares of Class B, it must offer those shares to all current holders of Class B shares, not just a select few. Similarly, if Company B wants to acquire a controlling interest in Company C, it must make its offer to all shareholders of Company C, not just a select few.

The all-holders rule is designed to promote fairness and transparency in the securities market by ensuring that all shareholders have equal access to information and opportunities.

all fours | alliance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.