Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

all-limitations rule

Read a random definition: joint authors

A quick definition of all-limitations rule:

The all-limitations rule is a principle in patent law that states that every part of a claim must be present in a product or invention for it to be considered an infringement. This rule is used to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents and ensure that only the specific elements of a claim are protected by a patent. Essentially, if a product or invention does not include every element of a claim, it cannot be considered an infringement of that patent.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The all-limitations rule is a doctrine in patent law that requires each element of a claim to be present in an allegedly infringing device in order to establish literal infringement. This rule limits the doctrine of equivalents and prevents its application to an entire claim, rather than the claim's constituent elements.

Examples: If a patent claim includes the elements A, B, and C, then an allegedly infringing device must include all three elements to be considered infringing. If the device only includes elements A and B, but not C, then it does not infringe on the patent claim under the all-limitations rule.

Explanation: The all-limitations rule ensures that patent claims are interpreted narrowly and that each element of the claim is essential to the invention. This prevents competitors from making minor changes to the invention and avoiding infringement by relying on the doctrine of equivalents. The examples illustrate how the rule applies in practice by requiring all elements of a claim to be present for infringement to occur.

allision | allocable

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah, try to get most of the readings done on the weekends so the weeks arent as bad
hurting for free time though
Quillinit
11:52
wasp i just looked at your cycle and did you like pee in the shoes of admissions officers?
the retroactive withdrawls really hurt me
made them question my ability to stick through law school
withdrawals in undergrad?
yeah 2 years of classes
Quillinit
11:57
ah you filed retro W's from classes in UG?
Quillinit
11:58
ah okay, sorry homie that's rough
it's fine i got into one of my top choices so im really happy
Quillinit
11:58
<3 happy for you
getting into cornell is hugeee
ayyyyy
Quillinit
11:59
^^^^^ would love to get into Cornell lmao
Quillinit
11:59
or anywhere!
you got it, believeeee
12:06
@letsseehowitgoesnow: you okay?
12:08
@ KnowledgeableRitzyWasp did u withdraw frm all your classes for two years or just a few? i have 2 W's
12:23
listening to the front bottoms at the gym again ist es over fur mich?
My wife and I saw TFB with manchester orchestra the night before thanksgiving a few years back and it was pretty damn choice
shaquilleoatmeal
12:27
yoo lets dawg what happened, you good?
12:28
breakup
12:28
happens to the best of us
12:28
@UnsuitableMaliciousHedgehog: that’s so fucking sick
rough night and morning with ex :/. we broke up but we live together
shaquilleoatmeal
12:29
damn ;/ it is break up season dawg, i'm sorry you're going through that
12:29
it really is breakup season
shaquilleoatmeal
12:29
i lived with my ex for 3 months after we broke up and it was brutal. If you can move out quicker rather than later
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.