Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

all-limitations rule

Read a random definition: depreciation method

A quick definition of all-limitations rule:

The all-limitations rule is a principle in patent law that states that every part of a claim must be present in a product or invention for it to be considered an infringement. This rule is used to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents and ensure that only the specific elements of a claim are protected by a patent. Essentially, if a product or invention does not include every element of a claim, it cannot be considered an infringement of that patent.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The all-limitations rule is a doctrine in patent law that requires each element of a claim to be present in an allegedly infringing device in order to establish literal infringement. This rule limits the doctrine of equivalents and prevents its application to an entire claim, rather than the claim's constituent elements.

Examples: If a patent claim includes the elements A, B, and C, then an allegedly infringing device must include all three elements to be considered infringing. If the device only includes elements A and B, but not C, then it does not infringe on the patent claim under the all-limitations rule.

Explanation: The all-limitations rule ensures that patent claims are interpreted narrowly and that each element of the claim is essential to the invention. This prevents competitors from making minor changes to the invention and avoiding infringement by relying on the doctrine of equivalents. The examples illustrate how the rule applies in practice by requiring all elements of a claim to be present for infringement to occur.

allision | allocable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.