Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

anchor

Read a random definition: jus individuum

A quick definition of anchor:

An anchor is a point of reference that helps people make decisions. In a court case, lawyers use anchors to persuade the jury to see things their way. Sometimes, people's estimation of value can be influenced by arbitrary numbers, which is called anchoring bias. This can be important when deciding how much money someone should receive as compensation for damages. For example, if a lawyer asks for a lot of money, the jury might think the damages are worth more than they actually are. This is why it's important to be careful when using anchors in court.

A more thorough explanation:

An anchor is a reference point used in various fields, including law. In legal proceedings, lawyers may use anchors to influence the jury's decision-making process through a technique called anchoring. Anchoring bias is a psychological phenomenon where people's perception of value is influenced by arbitrary numerical examples that may not accurately reflect the actual value.

For instance, in a court case where damages are being assessed, the plaintiff's lawyer may ask for a large sum of money to anchor the jury's perception of the damages suffered. This can lead the jury to conclude that the actual damages are higher than they may be. Anchoring with per diem damages, which are damages incurred per day, can be particularly effective because any potential bias effects in the jury's damages determination will compound as the number of days the plaintiff is compensated for increases.

Another example of anchoring bias can be seen in the pricing of products. A company may set a high price for a product initially, which can anchor the consumer's perception of the product's value. Even if the company later reduces the price, the consumer may still perceive the product as being of high value and be willing to pay more than they would have if the initial price had been lower.

In summary, anchoring is a technique used to influence perception and decision-making by using a reference point. It is important to be aware of anchoring bias in various contexts, including legal proceedings and consumer behavior.

ancestor | anchoring

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.