Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

antenuptial (prenuptial) agreement

Read a random definition: reciprocal interinsurance exchange

A quick definition of antenuptial (prenuptial) agreement:

An antenuptial agreement, also known as a prenuptial agreement, is a written contract between two people who are planning to get married. This contract outlines how their assets will be divided if they decide to end their marriage in the future. It is often used when one or both parties have a lot of money or property, children from a previous marriage, or other complicated financial situations.

A more thorough explanation:

An antenuptial agreement, also known as a prenuptial agreement, is a written contract between two people who are planning to get married. This agreement outlines the terms of possession of assets, treatment of future earnings, control of the property of each, and potential division if the marriage is later dissolved.

Antenuptial agreements are common if either or both parties have substantial assets, children from a previous marriage, potential large inheritances, high incomes, or have been "taken" by a prior spouse.

Example 1: John and Jane are getting married. John owns a successful business and wants to protect his assets in case of a divorce. They both agree to sign an antenuptial agreement that outlines how their assets will be divided in case of a divorce.

Example 2: Sarah and Tom are getting married. Sarah has children from a previous marriage and wants to ensure that her assets are protected for her children's future. They both agree to sign an antenuptial agreement that outlines how Sarah's assets will be divided in case of a divorce.

These examples illustrate how an antenuptial agreement can be used to protect assets and ensure that both parties are aware of how their assets will be divided in case of a divorce.

and | approach the bench

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.